Sheehan Genetics, et al v. Jakov P. Dulcich and Sons, LLC
Sheehan Genetics, LLC and Benkirk, Inc. |
Jakov P. Dulcich and Sons, LLC |
2:2014cv02227 |
September 25, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Dale A. Drozd |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
Patent |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 46 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/7/16: This action remains stayed. The parties are ordered to continue the filing of a status report every sixty days to inform the court of any updates in the interference proceeding. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 37 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/2/15 ORDERING that defendants' motion 30 is GRANTED and this action is STAYED pending the PTAB's decision. All dates and hearings currently set in this case are VACATED. The parties are di rected to file a joint report every 60 days apprising the court of the status of the PTAB interference proceeding, while that proceeding is pending. The parties are also directed to file a joint report within seven days of the PTAB's decision, advising the court of the decision and the parties' proposal for rescheduling the balance of this case. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 17 STIPULATION and ORDER RE: DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION FOR PATENT LITIGATION signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/29/15 15 . (Meuleman, A) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.