James v. Arnold
| Lovie James, Sr |
| E. Arnold |
| 2:2014cv02433 |
| October 16, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| Morrison C. England |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/07/16 recommending that petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus be denied; and this case be closed. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 11/10/15: The magistrate judge's October 14, 2015 order is AFFIRMED. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/14/15 granting 30 Motion to file a late answer. Respondent's answer is deemed timely. Petitioner's motion to strike respondent's answer 28 is denied. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/8/2015 DENYING petitioner's 21 request for appointment of counsel. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/9/2015 GRANTING petitioner's 17 request that this matter be stayed; this matter is STAYED; the Clerk shall administratively close this case; and within 30 days of exhaustion of state court remedies with respect to all of the claims presented in petitioner's second amended petition, petitioner shall inform the court that exhaustion has occured and he is ready to proceed. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/26/15 ORDERING that 14 Motion for extension of time is GRANTED; Petitioner is granted 30 days from this order to file his amended petition for writ of habeas corpus.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/14/14 ORDERING that Petitioners First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus... filed December 5, 2014 12 is stricken. The Clerk of the Court shall forward petitioner the form used in this district for application for a writ of habeas corpus by state prisoners. Petitioner is granted 30 days within which to file an amended petition on the form to be provided by the Clerk of the Court. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/10/2014 DENYING petitioner's 9 motion for leave to amend. (Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: James v. Arnold | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Lovie James, Sr | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: E. Arnold | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey White |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
