Iegorova v. Target Corporation
| Liudmyla Iegorova |
| Target Corporation |
| 2:2014cv03014 |
| December 31, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Morrison C. England |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 241 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/27/15 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Defendant's 7 motion to dismiss be denied as moot. The Clerk be directed to vacate all dates and close this case. Matter referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.. Within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/24/2015 ORDERING 7 MOTION to DISMISS Hearing Reset for 6/18/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman; Plaintiffs Opposition due by 5/21/2015; Defendans reply due by 6/4/2015; in light of the pending motion to dismiss, the Status Pretrial Scheduling Conference set for 5/28/2015 is VACATED. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/8/15 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP. Service of the complaint is appropriate for defendant Target Corporation. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to issue forthwith all process pursuant to Fed eral Rule of Civil Procedure 4. The Clerk of Court shall send plaintiff one USM-285 form, one summons, this court's scheduling order, and the forms providing notice of the magistrate judge's availability to exercise jurisdiction for all pu rposes. Plaintiff shall supply the U.S. Marshal, within 30 days from the date this order is filed, with all information needed by the U.S. Marshal to effectuate service of process, and shall, within 10 days thereafter, file a statement with the court that such documents have been submitted to the U.S. Marshal. The U.S. Marshal shall serve process within 90 days of receipt of the required information from plaintiff without prepayment of costs. (cc:USM). (Meuleman, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Iegorova v. Target Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Liudmyla Iegorova | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Target Corporation | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
