Oberg v. Capital One Bank, USA N.A, et al
Plaintiff: Danial Oberg
Defendant: Capital One Bank, USA N.A, CACH LLC and Neuheisel Law Firm, P.C.
Case Number: 2:2015cv00448
Filed: February 26, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: Garland E. Burrell
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 8/4/15. CASE CLOSED. (Manzer, C)
June 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER re 11 Settlement and Disposition signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 6/10/15: IT IS ORDERED that a dispositional document shall be filed no later than 6/29/15. Failure to respond by this deadline may be construed as consent to dismiss al of this action without prejudice, and a dismissal order could be filed. Further, the Status Conference scheduled for hearing on 6/22/15 is CONTINUED to commence 7/20/2015 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr., in the event no dispositional document is filed, or if this action is not otherwise dismissed. (Meuleman, A)
May 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 5/18/15 ORDERING that Capital One's time to file a responsive pleading to the Complaint is EXTENDED. Capital One shall file its responsive pleading to the Complaint on or before 6/16/2015.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
April 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 4/17/15 ORDERING that the 5/18/15 Scheduling Conference is continued to 6/22/15, commencing at 9:00 a.m. A joint status report shall be filed fourteen days prior to the hearing. Further Capital One is granted thirty days from the date on which this order is filed to file a responsive pleading to the Complaint. (Becknal, R)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Oberg v. Capital One Bank, USA N.A, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Danial Oberg
Represented By: David James McGlothlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Capital One Bank, USA N.A
Represented By: Hunter Randolph Eley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CACH LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Neuheisel Law Firm, P.C.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?