Lang v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Darryl Edwin Lang
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2015cv00624
Filed: March 19, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Carolyn K. Delaney
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/22/2019 GRANTING 22 Motion for Attorney Fees. Plaintiff's counsel is awarded $17,585.00 in attorney fees pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 406, to be offset in the amount of $6,000.00 previously awarded under EAJA. Plaintiff's counsel shall reimburse Darryl Edwin Lang in the amount of $6,000.00. (Zignago, K.)
April 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 21 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/15/16 ORDERING that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount of SIX THOUSAND DOLLARS ($6,000.00). This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff, to date, by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2412. (Becknal, R)
February 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/10/16 granting 13 plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment for purposes of further development and reconsideration of the record consistent with the court's directions set forth above. The commissioner's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment 14 is denied. The matter is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this order. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)
October 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/15/2015 ORDERING 15 Plaintiff's time to file a Reply to Defendant's Motion For Summary Judgment, the request is hereby APPROVED; EXTENDED 21 days from 10/12/2015 to 11/2/2015. (Reader, L)
March 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/23/2015 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP; DIRECTING the Clerk of Court to serve the 5 Scheduling Order in Social Security Cases; ORDERING the plaintiff to submit to the United States Marsha l within 14 days, a completed 4 Summons and copies of the 1 Social Security Complaint and to file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted; DIRECTING the U.S. Marshal to serve all process without prepayment of costs within sixty days. (cc: U.S. Marshal)(Michel, G.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lang v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Darryl Edwin Lang
Represented By: Shellie Lott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Bobbie J. Montoya, ss
Represented By: Jean M. Turk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?