De La Paz v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Enrico Ramon De La Paz |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2015cv00685 |
| March 26, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Allison Claire |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/20/18 GRANTING 26 Motion for Attorney Fees; Counsel for plaintiff is awarded $4,268.10 in attorney's fees; the Commissioner shall certify that amount to be paid to counsel from the funds previously withheld for the payment of such fees. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
24
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/18/2017 for the Award of Attorney Fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). (Jackson, T)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 9/15/2016 GRANTING Plaintiff's 15 Motion to Summary Judgment/Remand and DENYING Commissioner's Cross 16 Motion for Summary Judgment. This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent withthis opinion. CASE CLOSED. (Jackson, T)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/30/2015 ORDERING 17 Plaintiff's time to reply to defendant's 17 cross-motion for summary judgment, the request is hereby APPROVED; Plaintiff shall file his reply on or before 12/21/2015. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/19/15. Plaintiff's time to file a motion for summary judgment is extended to 10/12/15. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/30/2015 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 2 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve scheduling order in social security cases. The Clerk of the Court is furth er directed to serve a copy of this order on the United States Marshal. Within fourteen days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the United States Marshal a completed summons and copies of the complaint and file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted to the United States Marshal. The United States Marshal is directed to serve all process without prepayment of costs not later than sixty days from the date of this order. (Zignago, K.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: De La Paz v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Enrico Ramon De La Paz | |
| Represented By: | Shellie Lott |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Scott J. Borrowman |
| Represented By: | Bobbie J. Montoya, ss |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
