T.V. et al v. Sacramento City Unified School District
T. V., A. V., D. S., I. M., J. S., Jorge Maranon, Amy Schnetz, Isabella Maranon, Adrian Sanchez, Arthur Aleman, Will Valerio, David Schnetz, Jackie Valerio and Stephanie Sanchez |
Sacramento City Unified School District |
2:2015cv00889 |
April 23, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Allison Claire |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 67 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/30/19 ORDERING Mr. Jambeck to show cause within seven (7) days why he should not be sanctioned $250 for his failure to complete compliance with the court's 8/15/2018 order, by not yet filing the proofs of payment described above or a stipulation of dismissal, or why he has not requested an extension of time for completion. (Kastilahn, A) Modified on 7/31/2019 (Fabillaran, J). |
Filing 65 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/10/19 GRANTING plaintiffs' 63 Ex Parte Application to Deposit Funds to Blocked Accounts. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 61 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/15/19 GRANTING in part and DENYING in part 59 Request to Seal Document. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 60 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/6/2019 GRANTING 56 Ex Parte Application and ORDERING Leigh Law Group, P.C. to issue a check payable to D.S. from its attorney/client trust account in the amount of $7,513.00 which shall be deposited into a federally insured bank account opened in D.S.'s name for use consistent with the application. (Huang, H) |
Filing 55 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 08/14/18 GRANTING 43 Motion to approve the minors' settlement; APPROVES the proposed settlement and ORDERS as follows: Defendant shall issue a check for $100,000.00 payable to Leigh Law Group client trust account. From that amount, Leigh Law Group shall issue the following checks: (a) $31,700.02, payable to Leigh Law Group, P.C.; (b) $683.00, payable to the guardian of D.S.; (c) $1,366.00, payable to the guardi an of J.S.; (d) $7,513.00, payable to D.S. to be deposited into a federally insured blocked account; (e) $14,684.50, payable to I.S. to be deposited into a federally insured blocked account; (f) $14,684.50, payable to I.S.'s parents; (g) $9,789.66, payable to T.V. to be deposited into a federally insured blocked account; (h) $9,789.66, payable to A.V. to be deposited into a federally insured blocked account; (i) $9,789.66, payable to A.V. and T.V.'s parents. Mr. Jambeck shall file proof of the payments specified within 60 days, along with a stipulated dismissal. (Benson, A.) |
Filing 40 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/8/2018 ORDERING that this matter is REFERRED to the courts ADR Coordinator, Sujean Park, for referral to the Voluntary Dispute Resolution Panel (VDRP) for the convening of a VDRP session to take place in ninety (90) days, or as soon thereafter as possible. CC'd VDRP Coordinator. (Hunt, G) |
Filing 34 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/02/17 ORDERING that 33 Stipulation and Proposed Protective Order is NOT APPROVED. (Benson, A.) |
Filing 32 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/30/17: Discovery cut-off is extended to July 28, 2017 for the purposes of completing the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition noticed by Plaintiffs. Expert disclosure deadline i s extended to September 15, 2017. Supplemental expert disclosure deadline is extended to October 13, 2017. Expert discovery cut-off is extended to November 30, 2017. Joint mid-litigation proposal deadline is extended to December 7, 2017. Mid-litigation Status Conference set for 12/14/2017 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 30 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/12/2017 ORDERING Discovery cut-off be extended solely for the purposes of completing the Rule30(b)(6) deposition noticed by Plaintiffs on 5/16/2017, this deposition will be completed by 7/28/201 7; Expert Disclosure by 8/15/2017, Supplemental expert disclosure by 9/15/2017; Expert discovery to 10/10/2017; Joint mid-litigation proposal deadline remain 9/28/2017; and mid-litigation conference remain on 10/12/2017 at 2:30 PM in Courtroom 3. (Reader, L) |
Filing 27 STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/1/2017 ORDERING: Discovery cut-off is EXTENDED to 5/31/2017; Designation of Expert Witnesses is EXTENDED to 7/28/2017; Supplemental expert disclosure deadline is EXTENDED to 8/31 /2017; Expert discovery cut-off is EXTENDED to 9/22/2017; Joint mid-litigation proposal filing deadline is EXTENDEDto 9/28/2017; and the Status Conference CONTINUED to 10/12/2017 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Washington, S) |
Filing 21 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 02/02/16 ORDERING that defendant's 13 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: GRANTED without leave to amend as to plaintiffs' disparate impact claim and GRANTED with leave to amend as to plaintiffs' request for a permanent injunction. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED in all other respects. Defendant's Motion for a More Definite Statement is DENIED. A third amended complaint shall be filed within 14 days. (Benson, A) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.