Vale v. Gibson
Petitioner: Jesse J. Vale
Respondent: Connie Gibson
Case Number: 1:2014cv01588
Filed: April 7, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Eureka Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: PSLC AGB
Presiding Judge: Nandor J. Vadas
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER AFTER REMAND re 32 USCA Order (CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ATTACHED). Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 8/14/15. (napS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2015)
May 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Habeas Answer or Dispositive Motion due by 7/7/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 5/6/2014. (njvlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2014)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vale v. Gibson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jesse J. Vale
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Connie Gibson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?