Dedrick v. CVS Caremark, Inc.

Plaintiff: Jazmine (Ochai) Dedrick
Defendant: CVS Caremark, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2013cv00193
Filed: January 14, 2013
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Sonoma
Presiding Judge: Maria-Elena James
Nature of Suit: Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 31, 2013 19 Opinion or Order of the Court STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 07/30/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2013)
April 16, 2013 3 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER - Status Report due by 4/30/2013.. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 4/16/2013. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/16/2013)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dedrick v. CVS Caremark, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jazmine (Ochai) Dedrick
Represented By: Daniel B. Beck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CVS Caremark, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.