Waves Audio Ltd et al v. Motorola Mobility LLC et al
Plaintiff: Waves Audio Ltd and Waves Inc
Defendant: Motorola Mobility LLC and Motorola Trademark Holdings, LLC
Case Number: 3:2013cv01091
Filed: March 11, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Outside US
Presiding Judge: Edward M. Chen
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER granting 50 Stipulation for dismissal. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 08/18/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2014)
August 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER granting 48 STIPULATION to Vacate Hearing. Case Management Conference set for 8/5/2014 is VACATED. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 08/01/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2014)
June 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER granting 46 MOTION Change Deadlines. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 06/11/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2014)
December 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 40 CIVIL PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 12/03/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2013)
June 24, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 29 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 24 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Enlarging Time for Initial Disclosures filed by Waves Audio Ltd. Signed by Judge EDWARD M. CHEN on 6/21/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2013)
June 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 21 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 20 selecting Mediation by Waves Audio Ltd and Defendants filed by Waves Audio Ltd, ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/3/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2013)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Waves Audio Ltd et al v. Motorola Mobility LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Motorola Mobility LLC
Represented By: Kevin Joon Oh
Represented By: Thomas Mark Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Motorola Trademark Holdings, LLC
Represented By: Kevin Joon Oh
Represented By: Thomas Mark Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Waves Audio Ltd
Represented By: Bradley Dalton Coburn
Represented By: Perry Reed Clark
Represented By: John Scott Denko
Represented By: R. Floyd Walker
Represented By: Sherri A. Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Waves Inc
Represented By: Perry Reed Clark
Represented By: Bradley Dalton Coburn
Represented By: John Scott Denko
Represented By: R. Floyd Walker
Represented By: Sherri A. Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?