Waves Audio Ltd et al v. Motorola Mobility LLC et al
Waves Audio Ltd and Waves Inc |
Motorola Mobility LLC and Motorola Trademark Holdings, LLC |
3:2013cv01091 |
March 11, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Outside US |
Edward M. Chen |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 51 ORDER granting 50 Stipulation for dismissal. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 08/18/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2014) |
Filing 49 ORDER granting 48 STIPULATION to Vacate Hearing. Case Management Conference set for 8/5/2014 is VACATED. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 08/01/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2014) |
Filing 47 ORDER granting 46 MOTION Change Deadlines. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 06/11/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2014) |
Filing 40 CIVIL PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 12/03/2013. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2013) |
Filing 29 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 24 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Enlarging Time for Initial Disclosures filed by Waves Audio Ltd. Signed by Judge EDWARD M. CHEN on 6/21/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2013) |
Filing 21 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 20 selecting Mediation by Waves Audio Ltd and Defendants filed by Waves Audio Ltd, ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/3/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2013) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.