Cronk v. Reckitt Benckiser Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Plaintiff: Janelle Cronk
Defendant: Reckitt Benckiser Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2013cv03245
Filed: July 12, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Contra Costa
Presiding Judge: Maxine M. Chesney
Nature of Suit: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 10, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2014)
December 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 41 PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 12/10/2013. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2013)
December 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 39 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 5, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2013)
December 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS IN PART PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 3, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2013)
November 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 34 STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 26, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2013)
October 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER VACATING NOVEMBER 1, 2013, HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT IN PART. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 30, 2013. (mmclc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2013)
October 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Conference continued to December 6, 2013. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 16, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2013)
August 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS. Any amended complaint shall be filed no later than September 13, 2013. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 26, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2013)
August 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER VACATING AUGUST 23, 2013 HEARING ON MOTION. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 21, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2013)
August 6, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPIES OF DOCUMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE COURTS STANDING ORDERS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 6, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2013)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cronk v. Reckitt Benckiser Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Janelle Cronk
Represented By: Aaron Paul Minnis
Represented By: Sonya Lisa Smallets
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Reckitt Benckiser Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Represented By: Vincent N. Avallone
Represented By: Linda Larson Usoz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?