Altec Industries, Inc. v. Walker et al
Altec Industries, Inc. |
Edward J. Walker and Idle Reduction Tech |
3:2013cv03505 |
July 30, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Elizabeth D. Laporte |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 98 ORDER Granting Altec Industries, Inc.'s Motion to Enforce Settlement signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte: granting [90-4] Motion. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/8/2015) |
Filing 87 ORDER Following Further Case Management Conference by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. As stated at the conference, Plaintiff may file a motion to enforce settlement against Defendant Walker. The motion must be filed no later than March 31, 2015 to be heard on May 5, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2015) |
Filing 83 ORDER setting a further settlement conference for 3/10/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom E, 15th Floor, San Francisco by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte.(shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2015) |
Filing 81 ORDER regarding case status by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. The parties are ordered to file a brief update with the Court no later than February 25, 2015. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2015) |
Filing 78 ORDER directing the parties to file a joint status statement no later than 2/17/15 by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2015) |
Filing 76 ORDER directing the parties to file a joint status statement by 2/9/2015 by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2015) |
Filing 74 ORDER denying 71 Request for an Order Permitting Withdrawal of Counsel by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 1/12/15. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2015) |
Filing 66 ORDER continuing the status conference by Chief Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. The Court, with the agreement of counsel for the parties, hereby continues the status conference from November 25, 2014 to December 5, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. The joint statement regarding status is now due by November 28, 2014. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2014) |
Filing 65 ORDER setting status conference by Chief Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. A status conference is scheduled for November 25, 2014 at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom E, located on the 15th Floor at 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California 94102. The parties must file a joint statement regarding status no later than November 18, 2014. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2014) |
Filing 59 ORDER Setting Status Conference by Chief Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. Status Conference set for 8/26/2014 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom E, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte.(shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2014) |
Filing 56 ORDER Regarding Conditional Settlement Notice by Chief Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. The parties are ordered to file a brief update with the Court no later than 12:00 p.m. on July 18, 2014.(shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2014) |
Filing 47 ORDER by Chief Judge Elizabeth D Laporte granting in part and denying in part 39 Motion for Leave to File (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2014) |
Filing 38 ORDER by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte granting 34 Stipulation (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2014) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.