Reno Flying Service Inc et al v. Piper Aircraft, Inc. et al
| American Medflight Inc and Reno Flying Service Inc |
| Piper Aircraft, Inc. |
| 3:2013cv04346 |
| September 19, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Nathanael M. Cousins |
| Property Damage Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER GRANTING PIPER'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 22 . Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2014)
|
|
Filing
31
CONSENT ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY 29 . Attorney Randolph S. Hicks terminated. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 6/6/14. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2014)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER GRANTING 24 MOTION for Extension of Time. Plainitffs' response to defendant's motion for summary judgment 22 due by 5/22/2014. Reply due 5/29/2014. Hearing on defendant's motion for summary judgment 22 continued to 6/18/2014 01:00 PM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Signed by Judge Nathanael M. Cousins on 4/23/2014. (nclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2014)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER GRANTING Substitution of Attorney 11 . Attorney Michael John Terhar for Piper Aircraft, Inc. added. Attorney Nathan Lewis Winegar terminated. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 12/4/13. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
