K.B. et al v. Alameda County et al
K.B., Brenda Cook and John Spriggs |
Alameda County, Anthony Aniasco and Glenn Arrivas |
3:2014cv04676 |
October 20, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
Alameda |
Donna M. Ryu |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 52 STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING ALL CLAIMS OF PLAINTIFF K.B. AND ALL CLAIMS AGAINST INDIVIDUALLY NAMED DEFENDANTS ANTHONY ANIASCO AND GLENN ARRIVAS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 4/7/2016. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2016) |
Filing 43 ORDER VACATING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE HEARING: Re 42 Notice (Other) filed by K.B. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 11/17/2015. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2015) |
Filing 41 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 11/19/2015 at 11:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 11/10/2015. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2015) |
Filing 29 ORDER VACATING DATES AND SETTING COMPLIANCE HEARING. Compliance Hearing set for Friday, 7/24/2015 09:01 AM before Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Filing due 5 days prior. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 6/2/15. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2015) |
Filing 17 CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 1/29/15. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2015) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.