e.Digital Corporation v. Dropcam, Inc.
| e.Digital Corporation |
| Dropcam, Inc. |
| 3:2014cv04922 |
| November 5, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Jon S. Tigar |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 88 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ALL CLAIMS filed by e.Digital Corporation. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 27, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/27/2016)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR STAY PENDING INTER PARTES REVIEW by Judge Jon S. Tigar granting 83 Motion to Stay. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2016)
|
|
Filing
82
SCHEDULING ORDER. Deadline to amend the pleadings 1/13/2016. Designation of expert witnesses (party with burden of proof) 4/15/2016. Fact discovery cut-off 4/30/2016. Supplemental designation of expert witnesses (party without burden of proof) 4/30/2016. Mediation deadline 5/6/2016. Opening expert reports 6/10/2016. Rebuttal expert reports 7/8/2016. Expert discovery cut-off 8/19/2016. Deadline to file dispositive motions 9/9/2016. Pretrial conference statement due 12/6/2016. Final Pretrial Conference set for 12/16/2016 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, Oakland. Jury Trial set for 1/9/2017 - 1/27/2017 at 8:30 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 6, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2016)
|
|
Filing
78
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on November 30, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2015)
|
|
Filing
70
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 68 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER REQUESTING LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION STATEMENT AND NOTICE TO THE COURT REGARDING RESOLVED CLAIM CONSTRUCTION DISPUTES filed by Dropcam, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 31, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2015)
|
|
Filing
67
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 66 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Joint Stipulation Extending Time To Exchange Audio-Visual Materials filed by e.Digital Corporation. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 28, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2015)
|
|
Filing
65
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 64 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER JOINT STIPULATION SHORTENING TIME TO EXCHANGE AUDIO-VISUAL MATERIALS filed by Dropcam, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 22, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2015)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER FOR BRINGING EQUIPMENT INTO COURTHOUSE re 58 Proposed Order filed by e.Digital Corporation. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 16, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2015)
|
|
Filing
48
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 47 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND EXCHANGE OF PRELIMINARY CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS AND EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE (PATENT L.R. 4-2) filed by Dropcam, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 6, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2015)
|
|
Filing
43
SCHEDULING ORDER. Tutorial Hearing set for 7/20/2015 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Markman hearing set for 8/3/2015 at 2:00 PM. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 4, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2015)
|
|
Filing
38
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 37 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by e.Digital Corporation filed by e.Digital Corporation. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 12, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2015)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
