Novitaz, Inc. v. Shopkick, Inc.
Plaintiff: Novitaz, Inc.
Defendant: Shopkick, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2014cv05077
Filed: November 19, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: William H. Orrick
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 160 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 12/22/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2015)
December 10, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 158 ORDER granting 157 STIPULATION TO STAY CASE SCHEDULE PENDING SETTLEMENT. Status Report due by 12/28/2015. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 12/10/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2015)
September 28, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 150 ORDER TO MODIFY CASE SCHEULE granting 147 Stipulation. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 09/28/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2015)
June 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 139 ORDER CANCELLING JULY 1, 2015 DISCOVERY HEARING. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 06/29/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2015)
June 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 137 ORDER RESETTING DISCOVERY HEARING DATE - Discovery Hearing rescheduled for 7/1/2015 09:00 AM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 06/25/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/25/2015)
June 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 135 ORDER REGARDING JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER re 134 Joint Discovery Letter Brief filed by Novitaz, Inc. Lead trial counsel shall schedule and hold a telephone conference this week of at least three hours in length to identify and attempt to resolve th eir disagreements. If they succeed in doing so, they shall notify the Courtroom Deputy that their discovery dispute is resolved. Lead trial counsel for each party shall appear 6/30/2015 09:00 AM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. They should plan to spend that day meeting to resolve all existing discovery disputes. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 06/23/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2015)
March 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 125 SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING SOURCE CODE. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 03/18/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2015)
December 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 94 ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. William H. Orrick. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 12/5/14. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2014)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Novitaz, Inc. v. Shopkick, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Novitaz, Inc.
Represented By: Scott D. Gattey
Represented By: Woodrow H. Pollack
Represented By: Stefan V. Stein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shopkick, Inc.
Represented By: George Laszlo Kanabe
Represented By: Andrew Shichen Ong
Represented By: Diana Rutowski
Represented By: Nagendra Setty
Represented By: Kevin M. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?