Hartman et al v. National Collegiate Athletic Association et al
| Justine Hartman and Afure Jemerigbe |
| National Collegiate Athletic Association, Pacific 12 Conference, Big Ten Conference, Inc., The, Big Twelve Conference, Inc., The, Southeastern Conference, Atlantic Coast Conference, American Athletic Conference, The, Western Athletic Conference, Conference USA, Mid-American Conference, Mountain West Conference and Sun Belt Conference |
| 3:2015cv00178 |
| January 13, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| Alameda |
| Claudia Wilken |
| Antitrust |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
STIPULATION AND ORDER re (196 in 4:14-md-02541-CW) STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Re: Incorporation of Hartman Claims in Consolidated Amended Complaint and Coordination of Discovery from Hartman Plaintiffs filed by Mid-American Confe rence, Conference USA, Western Athletic Conference, Afure Jemerigbe, Southeastern Conference, Justine Hartman, The Big Twelve Conference, Inc., American Athletic Conference, Atlantic Sun Conference Inc, Shawne Alston, National Collegiate Athletic Association, The Big Ten Conference, Inc., Pacific 12 Conference, Sun Belt Conference, Mountain West Conference, Atlantic Coast Conference. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 2/18/15. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2015)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
