Barich v. City of Cotati et al
George Edward Barich |
City of Cotati and Michael Parish |
3:2015cv00350 |
January 24, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Sonoma |
Elizabeth D. Laporte |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 58 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 11/20/2015. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2015) |
Filing 52 ORDER by Judge Vince Chhabria granting 29 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting 30 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 34 Motion for Summary Judgment (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2015) |
Filing 42 NOTICE THAT THE COURT IS CONSIDERING SUA SPONTE SUMMARY JUDGMENT (msl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/9/2015) |
Filing 41 REQUEST FOR FURTHER BRIEFING. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 10/8/2015. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/8/2015) |
Filing 21 Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 20 Stipulation selecting Early Neutral Evaluation.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2015) |
Filing 19 Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 18 Stipulated Protective Order.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2015) |
Filing 10 ORDER, Case reassigned to J Hon. Vince Chhabria. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 2/24/15. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2015) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.