Rajala v. Sonoma County Go Local Cooperative, Incorporated et al
| Kelley Rajala |
| Sonoma County Go Local Cooperative, Incorporated and Sustaining Technologies, LLC |
| 3:2015cv00442 |
| January 30, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Sonoma |
| Jon S. Tigar |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 75 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS filed by Sustaining Technologies, LLC, Sonoma County Go Local Cooperative, Incorporated. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 7, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2016)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER re 67 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend ADR Deadline filed by Sustaining Technologies, LLC, Sonoma County Go Local Cooperative, Incorporated. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 18, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2016)
|
|
Filing
63
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 61 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Early Neutral Evaluation by Local Works, Flexible Purpose Corporation(a California corporation), Kelley Rajala(an individual), Kelley Rajala filed by Local Works, Flexible Purpose Corporation, Kelley Rajala. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 11, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2016)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND ANSWER by Judge Jon S. Tigar; granting 57 Motion to Amend Answer. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2015)
|
|
Filing
54
AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER. Mediation deadline 11/10/2015. Deadline to amend pleadings 12/11/2015. Fact discovery cut-off 01/15/2016. Exchange of Expert Reports/Disclosure due 03/04/2016. Exchange of Expert Rebuttal Reports/Disclosure due 04/08 /2016. Expert discovery cut-off 05/13/2016. Deadline to file dispositive motions 06/10/2016. Trial Briefs, Motions In Limine, Depositions and Discovery Responses, Proposed Voir Dire Questions, Form of Verdict, Joint Pretrial Statement, Exchange Jur y Instructions due 08/23/2016. Opposition to Motions In Limine, Objections to Deposition Excerpts and Discovery Responses, Counter-Designations, Objections to Voir Dire and Verdict Forms, Jury Instructions due 09/06/2016. Pretrial Conference set fo r 9/9/2016 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, Oakland. Jury Trial set for 9/26/2016 at 8:30 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on December 4, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2015)
|
|
Filing
44
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 43 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER filed by Local Works, Flexible Purpose Corporation, Kelley Rajala. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 13, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2015)
|
|
Filing
42
SCHEDULING ORDER. Mediation deadline 11/10/2015. Fact discovery due 1/15/2016. Exchange of Expert Reports/Disclosure 3/4/2016. Exchange of Expert Rebuttal Reports/Disclosure 4/8/2016. Expert discovery cut-off 5/13/2016. Deadline to file disp ositive motions 6/10/2016. Trial Briefs 8/23/2016. Opposition to Motions In Limine 9/6/2016. Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/9/2016 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, Oakland. Jury Trial set for 9/26/2016 at 8:30 AM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 21, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2015)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
