Qurio Holdings, Inc. v. DirecTV , LLC
| Qurio Holdings, Inc. |
| DIRECTV LLC |
| 3:2015cv01986 |
| May 4, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Haywood S Gilliam |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
125
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 124 Stipulation of Dismissal. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2016)
|
|
Filing
119
ORDER Vacating Settlement Conference Pending Decision on Stay by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2015)
|
|
Filing
105
Notice of Settlement Conference and Settlement Conference Order by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. A Settlement Conference is set for 11/6/2015 at 9:30 AM in Courtroom E, 15th Floor, San Francisco. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2015)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Re Scheduling and 91 Discovery Dispute. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2015)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 82 Motion for Pro Hac Vice Rajendra A. Chiplunkar. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2015)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER, Case reassigned to Hon. Haywood S Gilliam, Jr. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 5/11/15. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2015)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
