Chand v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
Saleshni Chand |
Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Equifax, Inc and American Honda Finance Corporation |
3:2016cv06311 |
November 1, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
San Francisco |
Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 77 ORDER DENYING r 39 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 5/26/17. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2017) |
Filing 68 CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 5/16/17. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2017) |
Filing 53 ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO DISMISS, MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND, AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers; Tentatively granting 39 Motion for Attorney Fees; denying as moot 26 Motion to Dismiss ; Plaintiff's request for leave to amend is granted. Amended Pleadings due by 4/3/2017. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2017) |
Filing 22 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Order to Show Cause Hearing re American Honda Finance Corporation is set for Friday, 1/13/2017 09:01 AM. Show Cause Response due by 1/6/2017. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 12/16/16. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2016) |
Filing 21 ORDER. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 12/15/16. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2016) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.