Taylor et al v. Honeywell International Inc
Plaintiff: Mark Lee Taylor and Pamela Taylor
Defendant: Honeywell International Inc
Case Number: 4:2010cv04659
Filed: October 15, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Oakland Office
County: San Francisco
Presiding Judge: Saundra Brown Armstrong
Nature of Suit: Airplane Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 181 ORDER granting 180 EXPEDITED PETITION TO APPROVE COMPROMISE OF DISPUTED CLAIM OR PENDING ACTION OR DISPOSITION OF PROCEEDS OF JUDGMENT FOR MINOR OR PERSON WITH A DISABILITY (E-Filed Under Seal) by Mark Lee Taylor. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 9/9/2015. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2015)
August 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 176 ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 8/13/2015. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2015)
June 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 166 ORDER FOR PRETRIAL PREPARATION. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 6/5/2015. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2015)
April 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 157 MANDATE of USCA: Issued pursuant to FRAP Rule 41(a). Costs are taxed against appellee in the amount of $171.68. (jlmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2015)
February 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 151 ORDER by Judge 2/21/13 granting 150 Stipulation (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2013)
February 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 149 WRIT of Execution issued against Plaintiffs in the amount of 43,261.62. (jlm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/7/2013)
January 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG granting 62 Motion to Vacate (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2012)
November 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG granting 49 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/4/2011)
October 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER by Judge ARMSTRONG granting 42 Ex Parte Application (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2011)
November 24, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER GRANTING re 24 Letter filed by Honeywell International Inc for Ellen Adler to appear by phone on 12/3/10 at 9:30 AM for the Motion to Compel hearing. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 11/24/10. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/24/2010)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Taylor et al v. Honeywell International Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark Lee Taylor
Represented By: Corey Newman Friedman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pamela Taylor
Represented By: Corey Newman Friedman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Honeywell International Inc
Represented By: Ellen Nudelman Adler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?