ArrivalStar S.A. et al v. Monterey-Salinas Transit Corporation

Plaintiff: Melvino Technologies Limited and ArrivalStar S.A.
Defendant: Monterey-Salinas Transit Corporation
Case Number: 4:2012cv00990
Filed: February 27, 2012
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: Oakland Office
County: Monterey
Presiding Judge: Donna M. Ryu
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28:1338
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ArrivalStar S.A. et al v. Monterey-Salinas Transit Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melvino Technologies Limited
Represented By: Kenneth E. Keller
Represented By: Michael D Lisi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ArrivalStar S.A.
Represented By: Michael D Lisi
Represented By: Kenneth E. Keller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Monterey-Salinas Transit Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.