Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
| Affinity Labs of Texas, LLC |
| Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, Samsung Electronics America Inc, Samsung Telecommunications America LLC, High Tech Computer Corp and HTC America Inc |
| Frank Shipman |
| 4:2014cv02966 |
| June 26, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
212
ORDER INCORPORATING DOCKET IN RELATED CASE AND ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING THE SAME. Court ORDERS: (1) that the docket entries and filings in Case No. 14-cv-2966 be deemed incorporated into Lead Case No. 14-cv-2717; and (2) that the Clerk administra tively close the docket in Case No. 14-cv-2966, but preserve those filings, as is done in the normal course. Future filings should be made only in the Lead Case docket, not on the administratively closed docket. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 4/8/15. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2015)
|
|
Filing
200
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO RELATE CASES; SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Conference specially set for Tuesday, 8/5/2014 02:01 PM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 7/8/14. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2014)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
