Vasona Management, Inc. v. Hall

Vasona Management, Inc. v. Hall

Plaintiff:	Vasona Management, Inc.
Defendant:	Sharon Hall
Case Number:	4:2014cv05265
Filed:	December 1, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office:	San Francisco Office
County:	Alameda
Presiding Judge:	Maxine M. Chesney
Nature of Suit:	Rent, Lease, and Ejectment
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1444
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 29, 2014	Filing 13 ORDER RE: MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; REMANDING ACTION TO STATE COURT Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 29, 2014. Having considered defendants application t o proceed in forma pauperis, the Court finds defendant sufficiently sets forth therein her financial inability to proceed without the payment of fees. Accordingly, defendants application is granted. For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds it lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the action. Accordingly, the action is remanded to the Superior Court of California, in and for the County of Alameda. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2014)
December 16, 2014	Filing 12 ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FOR REMAND AND FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME The issues presented in the motion to remand are presently pending before the Court in the Report and Recommendation, and plaintiff may wish to submit the matter on the reasoning set forth therein. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 16, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2014)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 29, 2014

Filing 13 ORDER RE: MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; REMANDING ACTION TO STATE COURT Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 29, 2014. Having considered defendants application t o proceed in forma pauperis, the Court finds defendant sufficiently sets forth therein her financial inability to proceed without the payment of fees. Accordingly, defendants application is granted. For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds it lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the action. Accordingly, the action is remanded to the Superior Court of California, in and for the County of Alameda. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2014)

December 16, 2014

Filing 12 ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FOR REMAND AND FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME The issues presented in the motion to remand are presently pending before the Court in the Report and Recommendation, and plaintiff may wish to submit the matter on the reasoning set forth therein. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on December 16, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/16/2014)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vasona Management, Inc. v. Hall
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Sharon Hall
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vasona Management, Inc.
Represented By:	Todd Bennett Rothbard
Represented By:	Nancy Weng
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?