Perez et al v. John Muir Health
| Marlene Perez and Rosa Cerisano |
| John Muir Health and John Muir Medical Center |
| 4:2015cv01792 |
| April 21, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Haywood S Gilliam |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
101
CONDITIONAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL Re 99 , 100 . Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 8/30/2016. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2016)
|
|
Filing
99
CONDITIONAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 6/29/2016. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2016)
|
|
Filing
97
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 95 Stipulation REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF EXPERT DISCOVERY DEADLINE (JUNE 24, 2016). (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2016)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Denying 84 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2016)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER REGARDING 71 MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON 70 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND 73 MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER. Reset Deadlines/Hearings Re 70 MOTION for Summary Judgment : Responses due by 5/26/2016; Replies due by 6/2/2016; Motion Hearing set for 6/16/2016 02:00 PM before Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam Jr.; Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/2/2016 03:00 PM; Jury Selection / Jury Trial (10-day) set for 8/22/2016 08:30 AM before Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam Jr. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 4/18/2016. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2016)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 74 Motion to Shorten Time for Motion to Modify Scheduling Order to Be Heard. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2016)
|
|
Filing
69
Discovery Order re: 67 Discovery Letter Brief filed by Rosa Cerisano, Marlene Perez. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 3/30/2016. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2016)
|
|
Filing
65
CORRECTED 64 ORDER Denying 63 MOTION TO FILE EXCESS PAGES. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 3/29/2016. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2016)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Denying 63 MOTION TO FILE EXCESS PAGES. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2016)
|
|
Filing
62
Discovery Order re: 61 Joint Discovery Letter Brief. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 3/24/2016. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2016)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER RE NOTICE OF REFERRAL FOR DISCOVERY. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James on 3/15/2016. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2016)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. REGARDING 47 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINES; 50 STIPULATION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR HEARING ON PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER TO ALLOW FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/28/2016)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Denying 43 Stipulation REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF TRIAL DATE AND PRETRIAL DATES. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2015)
|
|
Filing
40
****DISREGARD, SEE DOCKET NO. 41 .*** ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Denying 38 Motion to Relate Case to 15-cv-4564-RS. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2015) Modified on 11/9/2015 (ndrS, COURT STAFF).
|
|
Filing
35
SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 7/29/2015. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/29/2015)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 30 Stipulation Selecting Early Neutral Evaluation. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2015)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
