In Re: Steven Suraj Vachani
Plaintiff: Facebook, Inc.
Defendant: Steven Suraj Vachani
Case Number: 4:2017cv03184
Filed: June 5, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Jose Office
County: Alameda
Presiding Judge: Lucy H. Koh
Nature of Suit: Withdrawal
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 0157
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 31, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 17 Order Denying Motion for Withdrawal of Reference. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 8/31/17. (lhklc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2017)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In Re: Steven Suraj Vachani
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Facebook, Inc.
Represented By: Indra Neel Chatterjee
Represented By: Monte Cooper
Represented By: John Alan Farmer
Represented By: Frederick D Holden, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steven Suraj Vachani
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?