Aquino v. County of Monterey Sheriff's Department et al
| Nicolas Aquino |
| County of Monterey Sheriff's Department, Ivan Rodriguez and David Murray |
| 5:2014cv03387 |
| July 25, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Monterey |
| Edward J. Davila |
| Howard R. Lloyd |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 Violation of Civil Rights |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
277
ORDER DENYING 184 MOTION FOR DISCOVERY SANCTIONS. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/14/2018. (ejdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/14/2018)
|
|
Filing
265
ORDER DENYING 207 DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/12/2018. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2018)
|
|
Filing
223
ORDER DENYING IN PART AND DEFERRING IN PART 215 DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW RE BANE ACT. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/2/2018. (ejdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2018)
|
|
Filing
213
ORDER RE: TRIAL BIFURCATION AND OUTSTANDING EVIDENTIARY DISPUTES. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 7/30/2018. (ejdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2018)
|
|
Filing
202
ORDER RE: 198 MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S UNTIMELY FILED SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 7/24/2018. (ejdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2018)
|
|
Filing
187
FIRST ORDER RE: 120 121 122 123 125 127 130 133 135 MOTIONS IN LIMINE. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 7/10/2018. (ejdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2018)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER GRANTING 82 UNOPPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO ALLOW FOR SECOND DEPOSITION OF DEFENDANTS' OWN EXPERT. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/7/2018. (ejdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/7/2018)
|
|
Filing
79
PRETRIAL ORDER(JURY). Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 12/14/2017. (amkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2017)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 37 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 38 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/29/2016. (ejdlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2016)
|
|
Filing
51
PRETRIAL ORDER (JURY)- SEE ORDER FOR SPECIFICS: Based on the parties Joint Trial Setting Conference Statement, the court has determined an appearance is unnecessary at this time. Accordingly, the Trial Setting Conference is VACATED and the parties are ordered to comply with the following schedule. Joint Pretrial Conference Statement, Motions In-Limine and Exchange of Exhibits due 10/5/2017. Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/19/2017 11:00 AM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose. Jury Select ion set for 11/7/2017 09:00 AM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Edward J. Davila. Jury Trial set for 11/7/2017 01:30 PM, 11/8, 11/14, 15, 17, 21, 22, 28, 29 and 30/2017 (deliberations) and 12/1/2017 (deliberations). Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/12/2016.(amkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2016)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER GRANTING 48 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Trial Date and Modify the Scheduling Order filed by David Murray, Ivan Rodriguez, County of Monterey Sheriff's Department. The pretrial and trial dates and deadlines set pursuant to the Order filed on September 3, 2015 (Dkt. No. 32) are VACATED. The court schedules a Trial Setting Conference for 11:00 a.m. on September 15, 2016. The parties shall file an updated Joint Trial Setting Conference Statement on or before September 5, 2016. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 4/29/2016. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2016)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
