Sevy v. Netflix, Inc.
A consumer lawsuit seeking class-action against Netflix for alleged violations of the Video Privacy Protection Act.
| Michael Sevy |
| Netflix, Inc. |
| 5:2011cv01309 |
| March 18, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Paul Singh Grewal |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 11, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER by Judge Edward J. Davila granting (15),(46) Motion to Consolidate Cases; granting (22),(47) Motion to Appoint Counsel in case 5:11-cv-00379-EJD; granting (5), (13) Motion to Consolidate Cases in case 5:11-cv-00820-EJD. The Clerk of the Court shall consolidate these actions such that the earliest-filed action, 5:11-cv-00379 EJD, is the lead case. All future filings shall be in 5:11-cv-00379 EJD and shall bear the caption: "In re Netflix Privacy Litigation." All future related cases shall be automatically consolidated and administratively closed. Since the later actions are now subsumed by the first-filed action, the Clerk shall administratively close 5:11-cv-00820 EJD, 5:11-cv-01075 EJD, 5:11-cv-01218 EJD, 5:11-cv-01309 EJD, and 5:11-cv-01359 EJD. On or before September 12, 2011, Plaintiffs in In re Netflix Privacy Litigation shall filed a Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/12/2011. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2011) Modified text on 8/15/2011 (ecg, COURT STAFF).
|
| Pursuant to Signed Related Case Order ( 11 ). Case reassigned to Judge Edward J. Davila for all further proceedings and Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd for all discovery matters. Judge Paul Singh Grewal no longer assigned to the case. (tsh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/18/2011) |
| ***Deadlines terminated. 11 TERMINATING 6/21/2011 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE BEFORE MAGISTRATE JUDGE PAUL S. GREWAL. (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2011) |
|
Filing 11
RELATED CASE ORDER. C 11-00379 EJD Milans v. Netflix, Inc., C 11-01075 SBA Rura v. Netflix, Inc., C 11-01218 HRL Comstock v. Netflix, Inc., C 11-01309 PSG Sevy v. Netflix, Inc., C 11-01359 HRL Wizenberg v. Netflix, Inc. ARE RELATED. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/13/2011. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2011)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER by Judge Paul S. Grewal granting 8 Motion for Pro Hac Vice (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2011)
|
| Filing 9 (Proposed) Order Granting Application for Admission of Attorney Joseph J. Siprut for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice re 8 by Michael Sevy. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2011) |
| Filing 8 Application for Admission of Attorney Joseph J. Siprut N for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 275, receipt number 54611009363) filed by Michael Sevy. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2011) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER Approving Stipulation 5 . Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on March 23, 2011. (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2011)
|
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 and Certification of Interested Persons Under Local Civil Rule 3-16 by Netflix, Inc (Strickland, Rodney) (Filed on 3/22/2011) Modified on 3/23/2011 (bw, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 5 STIPULATION and [Proposed] Order Regarding Defendant's Response to the Complaint Due to Pending Motion to Consolidate re ( 1 ) by Netflix, Inc. (Strickland, Rodney) (Filed on 3/22/2011) Linkage added on 3/23/2011 (bw, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 4 ADR SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Statement due by 6/14/2011. Case Management Conference set for 6/21/2011 02:00 PM in Courtroom 5, 4th Floor, San Jose. (Attachments: # 1 Standing Order for Civil Practice in Cases Assigned for All Purposes to Magistrate Judge Paul S. Grewal, # 2 U.S. Magistrate Judge Paul S. Grewal Settlement Conference Procedures, # 3 San Jose Division Judges Standing Orders, # 4 Standing Orders for Judges of the Northern District of California)(bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2011) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Netflix, Inc. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2011) |
| Filing 2 Certification of Interested Entities by Michael Sevy (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2011) |
| Filing 1 Alleged Class Action Complaint for (1) Violations of the Video Privacy Protection Act (Summons Issued); Jury Demand; against Netflix, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 54611009310). Filed by Michael Sevy. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2011) |
| CASE DESIGNATED for Electronic Filing. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2011) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sevy v. Netflix, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael Sevy | |
| Represented By: | Marc Lawrence Godino |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Netflix, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Dale Richard Bish |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
