Beardsley v. County of Santa Clara et al
| Lloyd Beardsley |
| Department of Corrections, County of Santa Clara, Hammond, City of San Jose and Ramirez |
| 5:2013cv01378 |
| March 27, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Jose Office |
| Santa Clara |
| Edward J. Davila |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
ORDER granting 45 STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE. The clerk shall close this file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/7/2014. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/7/2014)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER Granting 43 Stipulation of Dismissal as to Joel Hammond ONLY filed by Hammond. Hammond (Corrections Officer) terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 3/7/2014. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2014)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT. Stipulated Dismissal or Joint Statement due by 5/2/2014. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 5/9/2014 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Edward J. Davila. All other pretrial deadlines and h earing dates are VACATED and any pending motions are TERMINATED. Failure to comply with any part of this Order will be deemed sufficient grounds to dismiss the action. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 3/4/2014. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2014)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE; RESCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The court reschedules this action for a Case Management Conference on 10/25/2013 at 10:00 a.m. The parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement on or before 1 0/18/2013. The court advises Plaintiff that failure to comply with further deadlines will result in the dismissal of this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) without further notice. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 10/1/2013. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2013)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. If Plaintiff does not, by 9/30/2013 demonstrate good cause in writing why this case should not be dismissed, the court will dismiss the action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). No hearing will be held on the order to show cause unless otherwise ordered by the court. The Case Management Conference scheduled for 9/27/2013 is VACATED. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/23/2013. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2013)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER re 22 Stipulation to Enlarge Time filed by County of Santa Clara. The time within which the defendant County of Santa Clara to respond to the complaint in this action filed on March 27, 2013 shall be extended to September 27, 2013. This date will not affect any previously set case management dates. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/3/2013. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/3/2013)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE The 120-day period for service provided by Rule 4(m) will expire on July 25, 2013. Accordingly, the court issues the instant Order to Show Cause ("OSC") requiring that Plaintiff, no later than July 31, 2013, either: (1) file documents to show proof of service of the Summons and Complaint on defendants; or (2) explain in writing why service has not been accomplished. No hearing will be held on the order to show cause unless otherwise ordered by the court Plaintif f is notified that the court will dismiss this action if Plaintiff fails to comply with this OSC or otherwise fail to show good cause as directed above. In light of the OSC, the Case Management Conference scheduled for July 19, 2013, is VACATED. ***7/19/2013 CMC Deadlines terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 7/15/2013. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2013)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
