Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Bargain Software Shop, LLC
| Adobe Systems Incorporated |
| Bargain Software Shop, LLC |
| 5:2014cv03721 |
| August 15, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| William Alsup |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen granting 41 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike ; and granting 42 Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss (emclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2015)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Re Plaintiff's Motion to Strike and Motion to Dismiss 41 42 ; and Order Temporarily VACATING Hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to Strike and Motion to Dismiss. Show Cause Response due by 2/5/2015. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/29/2015. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2015)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Denying 20 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, to Transfer Venue. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2014)
|
|
Filing
23
SUA SPONTE JUDICIAL REFERRAL FOR PURPOSES OF DETERMINING RELATIONSHIP OF CASES. Signed by Judge Alsup on September 22, 2014. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2014)
|
|
Filing
19
SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER TO ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 18 Clerk's Notice. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 10/16/12. (dt, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2014)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
