TMT Investments PLC et al v. Doe, 1-10
TMT Investments PLC, German Kaplun and Alexander Morgulchik |
John Doe |
5:2014cv05323 |
December 4, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
Santa Clara |
Howard R. Lloyd |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 Order by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd denying 17 Request to Reschedule Show-Cause Hearing. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/11/2015) |
Filing 16 ORDER DISMISSING FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 8/31/2015. (hrllc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2015) |
Filing 14 ORDER Continuing Show Cause Hearing to August 25, 2015, at 10:00 a.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 7/28/2015. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2015) |
Filing 11 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 7/28/2015 at 10:00 AM. Show Cause Response due by 7/21/2015. The Case Management Conference is continued to September 29, 2015, at 1:30 PM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 6/26/2015. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/26/2015) |
Filing 10 ORDER: (1) denying without prejudice 6 Ex Parte Application for Expedited Discovery; and (2) Continuing Case Management Conference to June 30, 2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 4/8/2015. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2015) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.