Makaeef v. Trump University, LLC et al 
| Plaintiff: |
Tarla Makaeef |
| Defendants: |
Trump University, LLC and DOES |
| |
| Case Number: |
3:2010cv00940 |
| Filed: |
April 30, 2010 |
| |
| Court: |
California Southern District Court |
| Office: |
San Diego Office |
| County: |
Orange |
| |
| Nature of Suit: |
Torts - Property - Other Fraud |
| Cause: |
28:1332 |
| Jurisdiction: |
Diversity |
| Jury Demanded By: |
Plaintiff |
| |
| Following Case: |
In re: Tarla Makaeff, et al v. Trump University, LLC, et al (11-55016) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download.
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|
| March 12, 2013 | 203 |  ORDER on Discovery Disputes. Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on 3/12/2013. (srm) |
| March 2, 2012 | 95 | ORDER on Discovery Issues. Signed by Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo on 3/2/12.(lmt) |
| May 16, 2011 | 70 | ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant Trump University's 50 Motion to Dismiss and denying 51 Motion to Strike. Plaintiffs' 349 claims are dismissed w/o prejudice. Plaintiff Patricia Murphy's fraud, misrepresentation, and false promises claims are dismissed w/o prejudice. Defendant's motions are denied in all other respects. Plaintiffs are granted leave to amend their complaint. If Plaintiffs wish to do so, they should file their third amended complaint w/in 14 days of the filing of this Order. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 5/16/2011. (jah) (jrl). |
| May 16, 2011 | 69 | ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant Donald Trump's 59 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs' statutory claims are dismissed w/ prejudice. Plaintiffs Oberkrom and Murphy's UCL and CLRA claims are dismissed w/ prejudice. Plai ntiffs' 349 claims are dismissed w/o prejudice. Defendant's motion is denied in all other respects. Plaintiffs are granted leave to amend their complaint. If Plaintiffs wish to do so, they should file their third amended complaint w/in 14 days of the filing of this Order. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 5/16/2011. (jah) (jrl). |
| February 11, 2011 | 58 | ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant Trump University's 46 Motion to Stay Pending Appeal. Court grants Trump University's request to stay proceedings on its counterclaim only. Proceedings on Trump University's counter claim are stayed pending resolution of Makaeff's appeal of Court's denial of her anti-SLAPP motion. Court denies Trump University's motion to stay proceedings on Pla's Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 2/11/2011. (jah) |
| December 6, 2010 | 40 | ORDER denying 31 Plaintiff/Counterdefendant Tarla Makaeff's Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's August 23, 2010, Order denying her Motion to Strike Trump University's counterclaims. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 12/6/10. (lao) |
| October 12, 2010 | 33 | ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendant's 16 Motion to Dismiss. Motion is denied as to claims of breach of contract, breach of implied covenant, money had and received, and violation of California Unfair Competition Law. Motion is granted as claims for negligent misrepresentation, fraud and false promise, under Rule 9(b) for failure to allege claims w/ sufficient particularity. Motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' CLRA claims is granted to extent claim is based on advertisement of the seminars w/ intent to not supply reasonably expectable demand. Motion is granted on Plaintiffs' claim for violation of the False Advertising Law as to Plaintiff Tarla Makaeff. Motion is granted as to claim for elder abuse. Plaintiffs may file a Second Amended Complaint to cure the deficiencies within 20 days of the filing date of this Order. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 10/12/2010. (jah) |
| August 23, 2010 | 24 | ORDER denying Plaintiff's 14 Motion to Strike 4 Counterclaim. Signed by Judge Irma E. Gonzalez on 8/23/2010. (jah) |
Last Document Downloaded: March 14, 2013 03:37:47 PDT
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to
PACER is required.
Follow case documents by RSS