Marable et al v. United States of America et al
| Phillip Marable and Gisela Marable |
| United States of America and BAE Systems San Diego Ship Repair Inc. |
| 3:2014cv01206 |
| May 13, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Karen S. Crawford |
| William Q. Hayes |
| Marine |
| 46 U.S.C. ยง 1101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
125
ORDER re Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law pursuant to Rule 52(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and granting 64 Motion to Apply the Appropriate Standard of Care. Plaintiffs have failed to establish by a preponderance of the eviden ce that they are entitled to prevail on the three causes of action alleged in the Complaint. It is hereby ordered that the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of Defendants BAE Systems San Diego Ship Repair Inc. and United States and against Plaintiffs Phillip Marable and Gisela Marable as to all causes of action in the Complaint. It is hereby ordered that the cross-claims for contribution and indemnity by the United States and BAE Systems are dismissed. It is further ordered that the Motion to Apply the Appropriate Standard of Care filed by Defendant BAE Systems is granted. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 12/21/2017. (mpl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
