Hamilton v. Lincoln Mariners Associates Limited et al
| James Hamilton |
| Lincoln Mariners Associates Limited, Aimco-GP, Inc., Maribel Robles and Does 1 through 20, inclusive |
| 3:2014cv01689 |
| July 17, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| William Q. Hayes |
| Nita L. Stormes |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER: The Motion to be Relieved as Counsel (Doc. 6 ) is granted. Andrew A. Rosenberry and Donald R. Holben shall serve a copy of this Order on Plaintiff James Hamilton. Plaintiff shall have ninety (90) days from the date this order is filed to notify the Court as to whether he will proceed pro se or retain new counsel. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 2/5/2015. (mdc)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER: The Motion to Dismiss is granted. (Doc. 3 ). The Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. No later than thirty (30) days from the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff may file a motion for leave to amend the Complaint accompanied by a propose d first amended complaint. If Plaintiff does not file a motion for leave to amend, this case shall remain closed or be remanded to San Diego County Superior Court, where this case was originally filed. Signed by Judge William Q. Hayes on 10/14/2014. (mdc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
