Taylor v. Taylor et al
Michael Douglas Taylor |
California Department of Corections & Rehabilitation, K. Smith, C. Taylor, John Does 1 through 10 and Jane Does 1 through 10 |
3:2014cv02190 |
September 12, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
San Diego Office |
San Diego |
Larry Alan Burns |
Barbara Lynn Major |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Secretary CDCR, or his designee, is ordered to collect from prison trust account the $350 balance of the filing fee owed in this case by collecting monthly payments from the trust account in an amount equal to 20% of the preceding month income credited to the account and forward payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 in accordance with 28 USC 1915(b)(2). Plaintiff 39;s Complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim and for seeking monetary damages against immune defendants pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(b) and 1915A(b). Plaintiff is granted forty five days leave from the d ate this Order is entered into the Court's docket in which to file a First Amended Complaint. (Order electronically transmitted to Secretary of CDCR). Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 9/25/14. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(kas) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.