Soler v. San Diego, County of et al
Plaintiff: James Soler
Defendant: San Diego, County of, San Diego County Sheriff's Department, San Diego County Office of the Public Defender, Salvatore Tarantino and Does 1-35
Case Number: 3:2014cv02470
Filed: October 16, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: San Diego
Presiding Judge: Michael M. Anello
Presiding Judge: Ruben B. Brooks
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 18, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 279 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 241 Motion for Attorney Fees: The Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Solers motion and AWARDS Soler $721,118.27 in attorneys fees and expenses. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 06/18/2021. (amk)
May 19, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 278 ORDER Denying 259 Plaintiff's Motion to Retax Costs. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 5/19/2021. (tcf)
February 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 277 ORDER Granting 276 Joint Motion to Dismiss Action with Prejudice as to Defendant Ernesto Banuelos. Each party will bear their own costs and fees. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to close the case. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 2/5/2021. (tcf)
October 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 253 ORDER Vacating Pretrial Deadlines and Hearings. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 10/13/2020. (tcf)
October 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 251 ORDER Denying 232 Defendant Ernesto Banuelos' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 10/5/2020. (tcf)
August 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 225 ORDER Granting 224 Joint Motion and Setting Special Briefing Schedule Re: Plaintiff's Anticipated Motion for Attorneys' Fees. The Court SETS the following special briefing schedule: (1) Plaintiff must file his motion for attorneys' fees on or before August 31, 2020; (2) Defendants Wilkins and Hobbs must file a response to Plaintiff's motion on or before September 28, 2020; and (3) Plaintiff may file a reply in support of his motion on or before October 5, 2020. Upon completion of the briefing, the Court will take the matter under submission and issue a written ruling in due course. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 8/6/2020. (tcf)
March 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 219 ORDER Re: Supplemental Jurisdiction Over Plaintiff's State Law Claims. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 3/24/2020. (tcf)
March 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 217 MINUTE ORDER. In light of concerns about community spread of COVID-19, the settlement conference set for 3/18/2020 is vacated and rescheduled for 5/19/2020, at 9:00 a.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks on 3/17/2020. (tcf)
March 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 216 ORDER Granting 215 Unopposed Request to Permit Telephonic Appearance. Defendants Wilkins and Hobbs' settlement representative is permitted to appear telephonically at the March 18, 2020 Mandatory Settlement Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks on 3/5/2020. (tcf)
January 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 209 ORDER Granting 206 Plaintiff's Request for New Trial Date; Fifth Amended Scheduling Order Regulating Discovery and Other Pre-Trial Proceedings. The deadline for Plaintiff to file a motion for leave to file an amended complaint is 1/17/2020. A Mandatory Settlement Conference will be conducted on 3/18/2020 at 10:00 a.m. in the chambers of Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks. The final Pretrial Conference is scheduled on the calendar of the Honorable Michael M. Anello on 11/16/2020 at 2:30 p.m. The Proposed Final Pretrial Conference Order must be prepared, served and lodged with Judge Anello by 12/3/2020. The trial is scheduled to start on 12/15/2020 at 9:00 a.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks on 1/13/2020. (tcf)
December 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 198 MINUTE ORDER: In view of the need for an amended scheduling order in this matter, each party shall file a case management proposal setting forth the party's proposed schedule for the remainder of the case. The case management proposals should address all items required to be included in the amended scheduling order. Additionally, Plaintiff and Defendants Wilkins and Hobbs should address the status of the case pending against Wilkins and Hobbs in the Eastern District of Arkansas, including any dates and deadlines currently set in that matter. The case management proposals should be filed by no later than December 13, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks on 12/6/2019. (tcf)
December 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 197 ORDER Denying 190 Defendants' Motion to Stay; Denying 189 Defendants Wilkins and Hobbs' Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 12/4/2019. (tcf)
August 11, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 160 ORDER Granting Defendants' 143 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 8/11/2017. (ag)
June 24, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 119 ORDER denying Plaintiff's 75 Motion to Compel Defendants to Allow Audio/Video Recording During Site Inspection at San Diego Jail. Pla may conduct site inspection of the San Diego Central Jail. During inspection, Pla may take still photographs, but may not make audio or video recordings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ruben B. Brooks on 6/24/2016. (jah)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Soler v. San Diego, County of et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Soler
Represented By: Todd W. Burns
Represented By: Gabriel L. Cohan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: San Diego, County of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: San Diego County Sheriff's Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: San Diego County Office of the Public Defender
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Salvatore Tarantino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-35
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?