Escobar v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Nanette Cornado Escobar
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 3:2014cv02741
Filed: November 18, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office: San Diego Office
County: Imperial
Presiding Judge: Larry Alan Burns
Presiding Judge: Bernard G. Skomal
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 26 and Order of Dismissal. Plaintiff's 21 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied, and defendant's 22 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 1/27/16.(kas)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Escobar v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nanette Cornado Escobar
Represented By: Lawrence D Rohlfing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By: U S Attorney CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?