De Leon v. Conexant Systems, Inc. et al
| Joseph De Leon |
| Conexant Systems, Inc., Maryland Lasalle Investment Management, Inc., Otis Elevator Company, Carefusion Corporation, ELPF Scranton Road Limited Partnership, G4S Security Solutions (USA) Inc., Cushman & Wakefield, Inc. and Does 1 through 25 |
| 3:2015cv00339 |
| February 18, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| San Diego |
| Barbara Lynn Major |
| Janis L. Sammartino |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| Americans with Disabilities Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
33
ORDER granting Motions to Dismiss ( 4 and 13 ). De Leon's ADA, Unruh, and Disabled Person Act claims against Conexant and Maryland Lasalle are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. All his claims against G4S are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The entire complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to invoke the Court's jurisdiction. If De Leon thinks he can remedy these defects, he must seek leave by ex parte motion to file an amended complaint. He must file his motion no later than March 21, 2016, and must attach his proposed amended complaint as an exhibit. If he files such a motion, Defendants may file a joint opposition by April 4, 2016. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 2/29/16. (kas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
