Salem v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Southern District Salem v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Salem v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Plaintiff:	Christopher Salem
Defendant:	Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Case Number:	3:2015cv01114
Filed:	May 18, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of California
Office:	San Diego Office
County:	San Diego
Presiding Judge:	Anthony J. Battaglia
Presiding Judge:	Bernard G. Skomal
Nature of Suit:	Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1391
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 17, 2017	Filing 79 ORDER denying 74 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. The Court is sensitive to Salem's position. However, the law is clear: The United States is immune from suits sounding in fraud and deceit, and its agencies cannot be sued under the FTCA. As such, Salem's motion for reconsideration is DENIED. (Doc. No. 74). Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 4/17/2017. (acc)
December 14, 2016	Filing 68 ORDER granting 40 and 60 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction/Failure to State a Claim; denying 58 Motion for Leave to File. The Court GRANTS Defendants' motions to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Federa l Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), (Doc. Nos. 40, 60), and DENIES Salem's motion for leave to amend, (Doc. No. 58). The Court DISMISSES this case WITH PREJUDICE. Accordingly, this case is now CLOSED. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 12/14/2016. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(acc) (sjt).

Date Filed

Document Text

April 17, 2017

Filing 79 ORDER denying 74 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration. The Court is sensitive to Salem's position. However, the law is clear: The United States is immune from suits sounding in fraud and deceit, and its agencies cannot be sued under the FTCA. As such, Salem's motion for reconsideration is DENIED. (Doc. No. 74). Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 4/17/2017. (acc)

December 14, 2016

Filing 68 ORDER granting 40 and 60 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction/Failure to State a Claim; denying 58 Motion for Leave to File. The Court GRANTS Defendants' motions to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Federa l Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), (Doc. Nos. 40, 60), and DENIES Salem's motion for leave to amend, (Doc. No. 58). The Court DISMISSES this case WITH PREJUDICE. Accordingly, this case is now CLOSED. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 12/14/2016. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(acc) (sjt).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Salem v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Salem
Represented By:	Leon E. Campbell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?