Shafmaster, et al v. US

Plaintiff - Appellant: JONATHAN SHAFMASTER and CAROL SHAFMASTER
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES
Case Number: 12-1726
Filed: June 13, 2012
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: Taxes (U.S. Plaintiff or Defendant)

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
February 11, 2013 Summary Shafmaster v. United States

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 11, 2013 106491008 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION issued by Sandra L. Lynch, Chief Appellate Judge; Bruce M. Selya, Appellate Judge and Jeffrey R. Howard, Appellate Judge. Published. [12-1726]
Search for this case: Shafmaster, et al v. US
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: JONATHAN SHAFMASTER
Represented By: James Edward Higgins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: CAROL SHAFMASTER
Represented By: James Edward Higgins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: UNITED STATES
Represented By: Seth R. Aframe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.