Davis v. Holder, Jr.
Petitioner: RADCLIFFE DAVIS
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Case Number: 14-2198
Filed: November 14, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
September 21, 2015 Summary Davis v. Holder
October 6, 2015 Summary Davis v. Holder, Jr.

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 106898533 ERRATA issued by court to opinion (published) [5938952-2]. [14-2198]
September 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 106891279 OPINION issued by Juan R. Torruella, Appellate Judge; Sandra L. Lynch, Appellate Judge and Kermit V. Lipez, Appellate Judge. Published. [14-2198]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Davis v. Holder, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: RADCLIFFE DAVIS
Represented By: Joshua Daley Paulin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Represented By: LaTia N. Bing
Represented By: Elizabeth Robyn Chapman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?