US v. Acevedo
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant: EDGAR ACEVEDO
Case Number: 15-1378
Filed: March 26, 2015
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 2, 2016 Summary United States v. Acevedo

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 107008596 OPINION issued by Jeffrey R. Howard, Chief Appellate Judge; David H. Souter, Associate Supreme Court Justice* and Kermit V. Lipez, Appellate Judge. Published. *Hon. David H. Souter, Associate Justice (Ret.) of the Supreme Court of the United States, sitting by designation. [15-1378]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: US v. Acevedo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Represented By: Dina Michael Chaitowitz
Represented By: Timothy E. Moran
Represented By: Christopher John Pohl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: EDGAR ACEVEDO
Represented By: Lenore Glaser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?