McDonald v. The State of Colorado, et al

Plaintiff - Appellant: KIRK MCDONALD
Defendant - Appellee: THE STATE OF COLORADO, HONORABLE R. THOMAS MOORHEAD and HONORABLE SHEILA A. RAPPAPORT
Case Number: 12-1488
Filed: December 11, 2012
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Constitutionality of State Statutes

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
February 12, 2013 McDonald v. The State of Colorado
Search for this case: McDonald v. The State of Colorado, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: KIRK MCDONALD
Represented By: Kirk McDonald
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: THE STATE OF COLORADO
Represented By:
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: HONORABLE R. THOMAS MOORHEAD
Represented By:
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: HONORABLE SHEILA A. RAPPAPORT
Represented By:
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.