Caplinger v. Medtronic, et al
Plaintiff - Appellant: PATRICIA CAPLINGER
Defendant - Appellee: MEDTRONIC, INC., a Minnesota corporation and MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC., a Tennessee corporation
Case Number: 13-6061
Filed: March 8, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 21, 2015 Summary Caplinger v. Medtronic

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Caplinger v. Medtronic, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: PATRICIA CAPLINGER
Represented By: James W. Dobbs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: MEDTRONIC, INC., a Minnesota corporation
Represented By: Murray E. Abowitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC., a Tennessee corporation
Represented By: Murray E. Abowitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?