Deron King v. Butts County GA, et al

Plaintiff - Appellant: DERON KING
Defendant - Appellee: BUTTS COUNTY GA and VAN G. WHALER
Case Number: 13-11794
Filed: April 24, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Jobs

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
August 13, 2014 Deron King v. Butts County Georgia, et al.

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 13, 2014 1107606331 Opinion or Order of the Court Opinion issued by court as to Appellant Deron King. Decision: Reversed and Remanded. Opinion type: Non-Published. Opinion method: Per Curiam. (Opinion corrected on 8/14/2014)--[Edited 08/14/2014 by JRP]
Search for this case: Deron King v. Butts County GA, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: DERON KING
Represented By: Regan E. Keebaugh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: BUTTS COUNTY GA
Represented By: Gary Kevin Morris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: VAN G. WHALER
Represented By: Gary Kevin Morris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.