Robert Brown, et al v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Plaintiff - Appellee: ROBERT BROWN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, DENISE PACK, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, MICHAEL TERRILL, on behalf of all himself and all others similarly situated, PALECIA BOYD, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and MICHAEL VOGLER, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant: ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.
Amicus Curiae: ASSOCIATION OF HOME APPLIANCE MANUFACTURERS, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS
Case Number: 15-11455
Filed: April 7, 2015
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Property Damage - Product Liability

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 21, 2016 Summary Brown v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Robert Brown, et al v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: ROBERT BROWN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Represented By: John C. Bell
Represented By: Lee W. Brigham
Represented By: Robert Brent Irby
Represented By: Amy E. Keller
Represented By: Charles A. McCallum
Represented By: Mark J. Tamblyn
Represented By: Edward A. Wallace
Represented By: Kenneth A. Wexler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: DENISE PACK, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Represented By: Lee W. Brigham
Represented By: Robert Brent Irby
Represented By: Charles A. McCallum
Represented By: Mark J. Tamblyn
Represented By: Kenneth A. Wexler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: MICHAEL TERRILL, on behalf of all himself and all others similarly situated
Represented By: John C. Bell
Represented By: Lee W. Brigham
Represented By: Robert Brent Irby
Represented By: Charles A. McCallum
Represented By: Mark J. Tamblyn
Represented By: Kenneth A. Wexler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: PALECIA BOYD, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Represented By: John C. Bell
Represented By: Lee W. Brigham
Represented By: Robert Brent Irby
Represented By: Charles A. McCallum
Represented By: Mark J. Tamblyn
Represented By: Kenneth A. Wexler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: MICHAEL VOGLER, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Represented By: John C. Bell
Represented By: Lee W. Brigham
Represented By: Robert Brent Irby
Represented By: Amy E. Keller
Represented By: Charles A. McCallum
Represented By: Mark J. Tamblyn
Represented By: Edward A. Wallace
Represented By: Kenneth A. Wexler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.
Represented By: John Beisner
Represented By: Benjamin Howard Brewton
Represented By: James Russell Jackson
Represented By: Chaundra C. King
Represented By: Philip M. Oliss
Represented By: Joseph C. Weinstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Amicus curiae: ASSOCIATION OF HOME APPLIANCE MANUFACTURERS
Represented By: Galen Bellamy
Represented By: Allison R. McLaughlin
Represented By: Michael Timothy Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Amicus curiae: CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Galen Bellamy
Represented By: Allison R. McLaughlin
Represented By: Michael Timothy Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Amicus curiae: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS
Represented By: Galen Bellamy
Represented By: Allison R. McLaughlin
Represented By: Michael Timothy Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?