USA v. Raymond Napolitan
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: RAYMOND ANTHONY NAPOLITAN
Case Number: 13-1863
Filed: March 29, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
August 6, 2014 Summary United States v. Napolitan

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 3011699877 PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: SMITH, VANASKIE and SHWARTZ, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 35. Judge: SMITH Authoring. [13-1863, 13-1936]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Raymond Napolitan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Rebecca R. Haywood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: RAYMOND ANTHONY NAPOLITAN
Represented By: Marc D. Daffner
Represented By: Raymond Anthony Napolitan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?