William Conover v. Meril Main

Plaintiff - Appellant: WILLIAM CONOVER
Defendant - Appellee: MERIL MAIN, Superintendent and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Case Number: 13-2103
Filed: April 19, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
February 25, 2015 William Conover v. Meril Main

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 25, 2015 3011887390 Opinion or Order of the Court NOT PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: AMBRO, FUENTES and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 7. Judge: AMBRO Authoring.
Search for this case: William Conover v. Meril Main
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: WILLIAM CONOVER
Represented By: William Conover
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: MERIL MAIN, Superintendent
Represented By: David L. DaCosta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Represented By: David L. DaCosta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.