Stephen Blackstone v. A. L. Thompson
Plaintiff - Appellant: STEPHEN BERNARD BLACKSTONE
Defendant - Appellee: A. L. THOMPSON, SUED IN HIS INIDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITY
Case Number: 13-4664
Filed: December 12, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 10, 2014 Stephen Blackstone v. A. L. Thompson

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 3011645413 NOT PRECEDENTIAL PER CURIAM OPINION Coram: AMBRO, CHAGARES and VANASKIE, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 6. BLD-272
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Stephen Blackstone v. A. L. Thompson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: STEPHEN BERNARD BLACKSTONE
Represented By: Stephen Bernard Blackstone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: A. L. THOMPSON, SUED IN HIS INIDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITY
Represented By: Robert A. Willig
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?